Building a Lead-investor List

Criteria worksheet + 50 pre-qualified funds.

A good lead‑investor list is short, specific, and partner‑level. You’re matching your stage, sector, cheque size and timeline to firms that can actually lead—not just ‘participate’. This guide gives you a criteria worksheet, reliable signals, and a tracker so you can run a tight process.

Key takeaways: Filter by partner fit, cheque size, and lead history before you email anyone. Target 20–40 high‑probability partners, not 200 firms. Sequence outreach in waves and keep your tracker obsessively up to date.

Partner‑first, signal‑driven, and sequenced in waves—quality over quantity.

Worksheet fields (score 1–5)

Field Description Why it matters
Partner fit Does a specific partner back your motion? Decisions are partner-led
Lead history Has led rounds like yours recently Capacity and conviction
Cheque size fit Usual lead cheque matches ask Ownership math works
Sector/geo thesis Clear relevance (publicly stated) Increases hit-rate
Speed to TS How fast they move to a term sheet Short cycles beat high prices
Follow-on reserves Capital for future rounds Reduces financing risk
Beyond capital Hiring, GTM, regulatory help Real value-add

Lead‑investor tracker (template)

Firm Partner Stage Cheque Leads? Speed Reserves Notes Status
Example Capital Jane Doe Seed $2–4 m Yes (2024–25) Fast Strong Fintech thesis Intro sent

The short version

Start with partner names, not firm logos. Filter by lead history, cheque size, thesis, and decision speed; then sequence outreach in 2–3 waves.

Your list should align on: stage (pre‑seed/seed/A), geography, sector, cheque size, and time to term sheet. Cut anyone who hasn’t led a round like yours in the last 24 months unless you have a strong internal sponsor.

What ‘lead’ really means

A lead proposes price/structure and commits most of the round. Look for recent lead deals by the specific partner who would back you.

Signals: term sheets issued, board seats taken, ownership targets (e.g., 15–25%), follow‑on reserves, and reputable co‑leads. Check portfolio notes and partner blogs for how they decide and what they avoid.

Criteria worksheet (copy/paste)

Score each candidate 1–5 on the factors that matter—then sort descending and cut the bottom half.

Score: partner fit, lead history, cheque size fit, sector/geo thesis, speed-to-term-sheet, follow‑on reserves, and value beyond capital. Keep free‑text notes on triggers (hiring focus, ICP, regulatory comfort).

Signals & data sources you can trust

Use primary sources first: firm sites, partner posts, and deal announcements; cross‑check with platforms for recency and cheque sizes.

Public trackers miss deals and lag. Start with the fund’s pages and partner writing; use platforms to fill gaps. Flag any stats older than 18 months and seek fresher confirmation during calls.

Partner mapping & outreach sequencing

Map one partner per firm who truly fits. Reach out in 2–3 waves so you can learn and adjust without stalling momentum.

Wave 1: 8–12 best‑fit partners. Wave 2: next 10–15 based on learnings. Keep a crisp intro email (why them, why now, your plan) and offer a short deck plus metrics page.

Core Web Vitals for your deck/data room

Make your deck page instant: INP ≤200 ms, LCP ≤2.5 s, CLS ≤0.1; compress images ≤150 KB and reserve space for embeds.

Busy partners decide in minutes. Preconnect to your CDN, use a system font stack, and include a downloadable PDF alongside a fast web view.

Methodology: how to research fast (and accurately)

Start from primary sources; use platforms to cross‑check.

Read the firm site and partner pages first: recent investments (who led, cheque size), ownership targets, board roles, and thesis posts. Cross‑check with public databases and press to confirm recency and cheque sizes. If a datapoint is older than 18 months, label it and re‑verify in your first call.

60‑minute workflow to draft your list

Time‑box the first pass; perfect it later.

  1. Write your constraints: stage, sector, geo, cheque size, timing, runway target.
  2. List 10 funds that obviously fit—one partner each.
  3. Score 1–5 using the worksheet. Cut the bottom half.
  4. Add 10–20 more via partner networks, portfolio adjacency, and platform filters.
  5. Sort by score, split into Wave 1 and Wave 2. Draft intros.

Email scripts (copy/paste)

Short, specific, and partner‑personalised.

Cold intro: “Hi [Partner], we’re building [what] for [ICP], now at [metric]. Fit with your [thesis] post on [link]. Raising [round] at [band] to hit [milestone] in [months]. Deck + 1‑pager here: [link]. Would 20 mins next week work?”

Warm forwardable: “Hey [Name], could you forward the note below to [Partner]? We think there’s strong fit given [specifics]. Happy to share a 1‑pager if that’s easier.”

GCC specifics (UAE/KSA)

Call out local mechanics early.

Mention entity structure (e.g., ADGM/DIFC/KSA), revenue currency, and hiring costs to show you’ve grounded the plan. Include local customer logos if available. If your round may include Shari’ah‑compliant investors, note how your model fits the structure.

Common pitfalls (and fixes)

Mass‑emailing, targeting firms that don’t lead, and leaving the status tracker stale.

Fix by starting with partners, asking directly about lead appetite, and updating the tracker after every touch. Avoid holding patterns—if Wave 1 stalls, launch Wave 2 with updated learning.

Checklist before you hit send

Run this in 5 minutes.

  • One partner per firm, validated lead history (≤24 months)
  • Cheque size matches your ask and ownership math
  • Deck and metrics page load instantly (INP ≤200 ms; LCP ≤2.5 s; CLS ≤0.1)
  • Forwardable warm intro written; crisp cold email ready
  • Tracker fields complete: status, last touch, next step, follow‑ups

Glossary (quick reference)

Lead: investor proposing price/structure and taking the largest allocation. Ownership target: % a fund seeks in a round. Reserves: capital set aside for follow‑ons. Wave: a sequenced outreach batch to preserve momentum and learning.

Case study (illustrative)

From 180 firms to 24 partners to 2 term sheets.

A UAE SaaS team began with 180 firm names from platforms and friends. They rewrote the list as partners and applied the worksheet, cutting to 36. Wave 1 (12 partners) produced 7 first meetings and 3 partner meetings; learning: emphasise GRR/NRR and down‑market motion. Wave 2 (12) produced 8 firsts and 3 partner meetings; two term sheets emerged. They declined a third with aggressive covenants. Total elapsed: 5 weeks.

Post‑meeting follow‑ups (copy/paste)

Send crisp notes within 24 hours.

  • Thank‑you email: “Thanks for today—attaching the ARR bridge and cohort slides we discussed. As agreed, we’ll share bank statements and a downside servicing case. Next step: partner meeting week of [date].”
  • Data‑room nudge: “We’ve added a short video walkthrough and reserved space for charts to avoid layout shift (LCP ≤2.5 s). If anything is slow, we’ll optimise the assets today.”

FAQ

Quick answers on building a lead list.

  • How many targets is enough?
    For seed/A, 20–40 partner‑level targets is typical. Fewer if you have very tight fit; more if your motion is unusual.
  • Should I include funds that rarely lead?
    Usually no. Exception: a clear internal sponsor or a recent thesis shift.
  • Do I pitch multiple partners at the same firm?
    Pick one partner first. Add others only if invited or if the first declines quickly.
  • How do I handle intros?
    Warm intros help, but a crisp cold email works if the fit is obvious and timely. Keep it to 5–7 sentences.
  • What if I don’t have recent lead comps?
    Use adjacent sectors and explain why your mechanics rhyme. Offer your band and milestone math.

Related reads: Seed Data‑room Checklist, Negotiating Term‑sheet Valuation, Runway Calculator.

Want a bespoke lead‑investor shortlist and outreach plan?